The writing was never the expensive part
The expensive part is the loop nobody closes. A post goes live, everyone moves on, and a year later it is sitting on page two while the team is busy producing the next one that will do the same thing.
Aeoly started from a complaint about tooling. There are good keyword tools, good writers, good rank trackers and good crawlers, and almost none of them know about each other. The keyword tool does not know what you published. The writer does not know what is ranking. The rank tracker knows a page slipped and has no opinion about what to do. The person in the middle holding it all together is doing the actual job, every week, forever.
So the product is not a better writer. It is the circuit: measure what is happening, decide what to change, plan it, write it, publish it to your own site, then check whether it worked and feed that back in. The parts that are hard to automate stay yours. Which market, which angle, which offer. The brief, the draft, the upload and the follow-up check are not that.
The other half of it is a refusal. Plenty of tools in this category are one prompt away from filling a domain with pages that say slightly less than the page already ranking. That does not give you a hundred chances to win, it gives Google a hundred reasons to think your site is not worth listing. So there is a score, and a line, and drafts below it do not go out.
What the name means
The mark is an open loop with one piece coming back in. A left to right pipeline ends, and the argument of the whole product is that this one does not: the last stage feeds the first.
Where it is
Aeoly is early. The loop runs end to end, the free audit is real, and the parts that are not finished are marked as unfinished wherever they appear. If something here matters to you and is not built, tell us and it will count for more than a roadmap vote.
Six things we will not trade away
Every one of these is enforced somewhere in the code rather than agreed in a meeting, which is the only reason it is worth printing.
A number on the page has to exist in the code
The counts on this site are read from the modules that implement them. The 42 checks are the length of the rule table. The publish line of 70 is the constant the scorer compares against. Nothing here is a figure somebody liked the sound of.
Publishing is a decision, not a default
Every draft is scored before anyone sees it, and anything under 70 waits for a human. A tool that will publish whatever it produced is not saving you work, it is moving the work to whoever cleans up after it.
Read your data, never write to it
Search Console and Analytics are connected read-only. The crawler obeys robots.txt, including Crawl-delay, and has no code path that changes a page it is reading. The only thing Aeoly writes is the article you asked for, into the CMS you connected.
Show what it cost, while it is costing it
Every paid lookup is priced and added to a running total as it happens. An invoice at the end of the month that nobody can explain is how people quietly lose trust in a tool they otherwise like.
One change at a time
Every change gets 28 days on its own before the result is judged. Two edits to the same page in one week means neither can be credited with what happened next, and a programme built that way accumulates opinions instead of evidence.
Say what is not built yet
Platforms that do not have a working connection are marked as coming, not listed as live. The integration grid is generated from the adapters that exist, so it cannot flatter itself.
The quickest way to judge it is to point it at your site
A real audit of your pages, free, without an account. If it tells you something you did not know, the rest of the product is built on the same idea.